Valve Jackets

When valves in industrial plants are insulated with conventional methods, the insulation has to be torn off and rebuilt at every maintenance. OPTERM valve jackets, removable valve insulation jackets, offer a system that comes off in minutes during maintenance and goes back on afterwards. Every jacket is measured for its specific valve and sized with an ISO 12241 calculation.

Hot and coldService Lines
ISO 12241Thickness Calculation
DN15–DN1200Size Range
Remove and refitReusable
Why a Valve Jacket?

Maintenance shouldn't mean destroying the insulation.

When mineral wool + sheet-metal cladding is applied over a valve, the entire assembly has to be torn off and re-applied at the first maintenance. In other words, the insulation cost is repeated at every overhaul. OPTERM's removable valve jackets break this cycle: the jacket comes off in minutes, maintenance is done, and the same jacket goes back on.

On valves that are opened often, once the cost of rebuilding fixed insulation at every maintenance is included, a removable jacket is often the more economical option; the comparison depends on the number of valves and maintenance frequency.

Request a Quote
Removable valve jacket installation at an industrial plant, field application
Removable valve jacket

Removed for maintenance, refitted in the same place

Valve bodies and flanges are the points on a line that lose the most heat and need the most frequent maintenance. Heat leaves these surfaces by conduction, convection and radiation; wind increases convection. A removable jacket limits this flow and, for maintenance, opens within minutes and is refitted in the same place. Select a view and a wind speed; the values change accordingly.

Convection Radiation Conduction Wind pipe insulation pipe insulation VALVE JACKET Working principle Schematic view PARAMETERS DN80 flanged globe valve Process 180 °C · Ambient 25 °C Operation 7,200 h/yr Surface temperature Annual heat loss Heat leaving the surface COMPONENTS OPTERM · Industrial Insulation
Wind

Schematic drawing for illustration. Still-air (0 m/s) values are taken from the example calculation on this page: DN80 flanged globe valve, 180 °C process temperature, 25 °C ambient, 7,200 h/yr. Windy cases are estimates derived from these values using general heat transfer correlations (equivalent cylinder approach, surface emissivity 0.9). A cooler jacket surface measured in wind does not mean the heat loss is lower.

Features

We don't use standard molds.

Every valve geometry is different: globe, butterfly, segmented ball, control valve; each body has a different form. That's why we design and manufacture each jacket from one-to-one measurements.

Made-to-measure production

Every valve, flange and structure has a different geometry. The jacket encloses the body, bonnet and flange connections, with openings for the stem, handwheel or actuator so valve operation is not obstructed.

Fast removal / refit

Time is critical during periodic maintenance. The jacket is removed and refitted within minutes using dedicated mechanical fasteners or a zipper.

ISO 12241 calculated thickness

Insulation thickness, surface temperature and energy savings are determined by the standard calculation method. Not a guess. A calculation.

Surface temperature verification

After installation, a thermal-camera check is performed to confirm the surface temperature predicted at the design stage has been achieved.

Material Options

Filler and facing matched to the service conditions.

We don't offer a single material option, and we don't work with a "one fabric fits all" mindset. We determine the most suitable combination together with you, based on service temperature, chemical environment, moisture conditions and budget.

The most common outer facing is silicone-coated fiberglass (continuous service up to 250°C, water absorption below 0.2%, UV and ozone resistant). On lines with acid vapor or aggressive chemicals, PTFE (Teflon)-coated fiberglass is preferred; where mechanical abrasion is heavy, PU-coated fiberglass is used. At extreme temperatures above 800°C we switch to silica or ceramic fiber fabrics, and to V4A stainless steel mesh where there is a risk of heavy mechanical impact.

Inner filler options

Rock wool (standard, economical), needled fiberglass (won't settle in vibrating environments), aerogel/Pyrogel (high insulation with a thin profile in tight spaces) or ceramic wool (1000–1260°C); selected according to operating temperature and space constraints.

Outer facing options

Silicone-coated fiberglass, PTFE (Teflon)-coated fiberglass, PU-coated fiberglass, aluminum-foil laminated fabric or V4A stainless steel mesh; selected according to moisture, steam, chemical environment and mechanical impact requirements.

Cold line / condensation prevention

On chiller and cooling lines, elastomeric rubber filler or PVC outer facing prevents condensation and the associated corrosion risk.

Fastening system

Stainless steel lacing hooks, zipper or hook-and-loop; determined by how often the jacket will be removed and how easy access needs to be.

Applications

We work in every sector with a high-temperature process.

Cement kiln lines, petrochemical process piping, power plant steam systems, food processing steam networks, automotive paint-shop ovens; some typical environments where valve jackets are used.

Request a Site Audit
Valve jacket application at a petrochemical plant, removable industrial insulation
Sample Calculation

Heat loss of a single valve: a sample calculation

The figures below are taken from a sample audit scenario calculated on Optimizi.App using the ISO 12241 method. Scenario: an uninsulated DN80 globe valve operating at a 180°C process temperature, in a plant running 7,200 hours a year.

7,503 kWh/yrAnnual heat loss of the uninsulated valve. With a valve jacket, the loss drops to 589 kWh.
+6,913 kWhAnnual energy savings on a single valve; 92% of the loss is prevented by the valve jacket.
869 m³ natural gasAnnual fuel waste (at 90% boiler efficiency). A financial loss of ₺13,904/year at current unit prices.
180°C → 35.4°CThe outer surface temperature drops to a level considered safe to touch; the risk of contact burns is greatly reduced.
1.68 t CO₂/yrPrevented annual fuel-related carbon emissions (natural gas equivalent).

Assumptions: 25°C ambient temperature, 0 km/h wind, 90% boiler efficiency, natural gas at 8,250 kcal/m³ and ₺16.00/m³. Calculations are an engineering simulation based on steady-state conditions; results may vary under actual field conditions. Financial figures are calculated at the unit prices valid on the report date (July 2026).

Calculate your own plant's losses with Optimizi.App →

Frequently asked questions

The payback period depends on surface temperature, valve diameter, annual operating hours and the energy unit price; it is usually short on high-temperature lines running continuously and longer at lower temperatures or short operating hours. For an exact figure we schedule a site audit and calculate it on our Optimizi platform. See our step-by-step valve jacket payback article for the calculation method.

For personnel protection, the target outer surface temperature is set at 60°C or lower in most projects; the acceptable value depends on contact time and the surface material. Even brief contact with a surface above this can cause burns. Many industrial valves operate above 150°C when uninsulated. A valve jacket is designed with the thickness needed to bring the outer surface down to the project's target temperature, which greatly reduces the burn risk.

Sheet-metal cladding is a fixed insulation system applied to tank, pipe and equipment surfaces; it is economical on large surfaces and unchanging lines. A valve jacket, with its removable and reattachable design, is preferred at points that require frequent maintenance. The two methods are usually applied in the same plant to complement each other.

In a sample calculation performed on Optimizi.App according to ISO 12241, an uninsulated DN80 globe valve operating at a 180°C process temperature loses 7,503 kWh per year (7,200 operating hours/year, 25°C ambient). With a 90% boiler efficiency, that equals 869 m³ of natural gas and 1.68 tonnes of CO₂ per year. With a valve jacket installed, the loss drops to 589 kWh, a saving of 6,913 kWh per year on a single valve. When a plant has hundreds of valves, the difference becomes a significant line item on the annual energy bill. In our thermal-camera site audits we measure and report the loss of each individual valve.

How much are the valves in your plant losing? Let's measure it together.

Get in Touch
Call WhatsApp